On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
themattharris <thematthar...@twitter.com> wrote:

> The time format is a little weird and as far as I know, doesn't match
> any RFC. Instead it matches the ruby default and is represented in
> tokens by:
>   %a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Z %Y

which leads to the next question:

why is that the Ruby default? Did they Ruby author forget the year and
then decided to tack it on the end?

-- 
Bernd Stramm
<bernd.str...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to