I appreciate it.  I really just wanted to make sure it works as
designed.

Thank you.

Colt

On May 5, 6:18 pm, "Orian Marx (@orian)" <or...@orianmarx.com> wrote:
> Yes you need both the in_reply_to information to be set as well as the
> @username to appear within the tweet. And yes, this could be
> documented better.
>
> @orian
>
> On May 5, 2:29 pm, Colt Fred <coltf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Greetings community,
>
> > I've experienced a problem recently that I can't find an "official"
> > answer to.  I'm attempting to use the update rest api and I'm passing
> > in "in_reply_to=XXXXXX", but it's being ignored.  If I include a
> > "@user" where user is the owner of the tweet id I passed in, it works
> > fine.
>
> > The official api documentation makes no note of this and I see that
> > there was talk of not requiring the @user here(http://
> > groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/browse_thread/thread/
> > f009c76d17199084?pli=1) but I also see someone complaining about the
> > same problem here (http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-
> > talk/browse_thread/thread/4ed686abbf59164b).
>
> > What's twitter's official stance?  If it is required to make the "in
> > reply to link", it should be noted in the api documentation.
>
> > Thanks!
>
> > Colt

-- 
Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
Issues/Enhancements Tracker: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
Change your membership to this group: 
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk

Reply via email to