Hello Wilfried, Thank you for the reply. I am not sure how to determine which one is my real address (192.168.1.250 should be the right one) so I thought I would just broadcast on all interfaces (including the ones installed by vmware and the wired connection) and I hoped 0.0.0.0 would work.
It looks like the simple solution is to broadcast on all interfaces one by one with 0.0.0.0 and set the LocalAddr to each of the local IPs. I'll try if this works. Is there an easy way to get default gateway and subnet mask? -- Best regards, Jack Tuesday, April 5, 2005, 3:18:17 AM, you wrote: WM> Hello Jack, WM> Seems you have a subnet mask of /16 WM> Then the broadcast ip has to be: 192.168.255.255 WM> If mask is /16 then it has to go out on all interfaces (I never tryed WM> this). WM> --- WM> Rgds, Wilfried WM> http://www.mestdagh.biz WM> Monday, April 4, 2005, 20:26, Jack wrote: >> Hello Francois and all, >> I am trying the UDP sender (broadcaster) demo. >> I have multiple interfaces on my PC: >> wired (disconnected) >> wireless (192.168.1.250) >> two virtual interfaces installed by vmware >> (192.168.174.1, 192.168.88.1) >> My LAN is on the 192.168.1 subnet. However, when I do a >> UDP broadcast with the sample, the UDP packet actually >> goes to the 192.168.88 subnet. It seems that setting >> LocalAddr to 0.0.0.0 doesn't make it broadcast on all >> interfaces. Any easy way to fix it? I know I can do >> a broadcast on all interface by setting the LocalAddr >> to each of them. I wonder if there is a simple way. >> -- >> Best regards, >> Jack -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be