On 15-Aug-05 10:52:10 Francois PIETTE wrote: [...]
>>>b.1) There is already a property "Options" which is a set of properties. >>>It >>>is better to extent this set. >> >> First, I mention record but I mean object. >> Usually I don't use anymore a set for a property mainly for two >> reasons. The first is that set are limited in the number of members. >> The second, and more important for me, is that sets doesn't works >> well with VFI, because you cannot "switch" a member without affecting >> the others. >> But last word is yours. >Sets are limited to 128 members if memory serve me well. The limit is 256, but it fall to 32 for properties. >They are nicely handled by the object inspector. >I don't know what VFI stands for. Visual Form Inheritance. I can explain in detail why set properties are a drawback in this case if you want. Bye, Maurizio. -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
