Dod wrote:
> Hello Arno,
> I could but...don't remember where is my stop-time watch I just bought
> around the corner to make it pause life-time for next 10 years :-)

However, most high level components would benefit from such a buffered stream,
highly efficient, and don't forget "I am programming, therefore I exist" ;-)

> AG> Dod wrote:
>>> Also  remember  that  if you use xDSL connection your upload bandwidth
>>> much smaller than download one.
> AG> Yes I know, I was just wondering whether file caching can make such a
> big AG> difference.
> AG> BTW: I already suggested last year to write/implement a tiny buffered
> stream AG> class, that would boost performance in most high level ICS
> components. AG> I'm actually busy with another ICS work, if somebody has
> some time and wants AG> to enter the Hall Of Fame...;-)
>>>>> Is GET faster than PUT?
>>>>> In my tests GET performs seven times faster than PUT.
>>> FP> Considering the transport, there is no reason to have a speed
>>> difference.
>>>>> Server caches files, is that the reason?
>>> FP> That helps have high performance.
>>> FP> --
>>> FP>
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto
Visit our website at

Reply via email to