Arno Garrels wrote: > Code that is published as/in ICS was mostly contributed because the authors > would have written it anyway and they decided to give it away as freeware > under the license of ICS. The principle is simple, if you use ICS in your > applications, you should make your own improvements or bugfixes public. > If you do not it's your turn, but then you are not belonging to the > people who are interested in moving this project forward. > (not everything in the world is a business model!)
Arno, Although I agree with your philosophy, I believe that he was referring to Francois himself releasing ICS as "open source". Although I'm sure that only Francois can answer that question, I think that it is appropriate to make a few important distinctions: 1. ICS is not "open source" as in Open Source Software, i.e. it does not adhere to any of the OSS licenses. It is "freeware" (or more specific, "postcard-ware" :), that Francois happens to offer with source. He reserves the right at any time to stop this and to prevent anybody else from distributing the source. As a matter of fact, Francois does not currently give permission to distribute ICS source by anybody except him. 2. Francois does not generate money from ICS; as far as I know, he originally made money from the MidWare components, which were the commercial, industrial-strength components. He gave ICS away in return for a postcard, but he wasn't expecting to make a business model out of it. dZ. -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be