Fastream Technologies wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ICS support mailing" <email@example.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 8:31 PM > Subject: Re: [twsocket] TFtpServer time not listed > > >> Fastream Technologies wrote: >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 7:29 PM >>> Subject: Re: [twsocket] TFtpServer time not listed >>> >>> >>>>>> My applications all use the MLSD directory stuff, >>>>> Are those commands supported by most servers today? >>>> >>>> All except for Microsoft I think, while each new HTTP server in IIS is >>>> a major step forward, the IIS FTP server is still pretty pathetic in >>>> terms of modern commands, no SSL and only integrated security. >>>> >>>> But my only applications with the ICS FTP server are for use with my >>>> own clients. A public FTP server needs a lot of security and stuff to >>>> be safe, I'm not planning on offering one. >>> >>> We have been supporting MLSD/MLST before ICS began doing so. Angus is >>> right about security as NETFile server FTP part was on bugtraq a few >>> times. Thank God it is no longer vulnerable--at least to those in >>> Bugtraq and Vulnerability Watch. >> >> I don't understand, why should MLSD/MLST be more unsecure than LIST? > > No, I mean FTP (as a protocol) is more unsecure than HTTP. Our product is > both a web server and a FTP server combined > (http://www.fastream.com/netfileserver.htm) and bugtraq hunters hunted the > FTP side more.
That may be, but has nothing to do with the OP. I count this in as yet another promotion attempt. Arno Garrels -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be