Fastream Technologies wrote: >>> So do you think this design is not mature? >> >> It is working reliable. Since there may be messages in the queue for >> the windowless client, my only idea was to block the listener thread. >> If there's a smarter/faster way please let us know. > > I do not have a better alternative for v5 but v6 promises big. IF ONLY IT > WORKED IN C++!
I have not yet looked at V6, but I fear the basic problem, getting the client object from one thread context into another after DUP, remains the same. --- Arno Garrels [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be