Fastream Technologies wrote:
>>> So do you think this design is not mature?
>> It is working reliable. Since there may be messages in the queue for
>> the windowless client, my only idea was to block the listener thread.
>> If there's a smarter/faster way please let us know.
> I do not have a better alternative for v5 but v6 promises big. IF ONLY IT

I have not yet looked at V6, but I fear the basic problem, getting the
client object from one thread context into another after DUP, remains the

Arno Garrels [TeamICS]

To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto
Visit our website at

Reply via email to