Some more tests (modified buffer size for the 2nd test)

ICS: ~23s, 377 x 8KB, 55-60ms between packets: http://pastebin.com/Uq5mphUH
ICS @ 64KB: ~22s, 48 x 64KB, 450-470ms between packets:
http://pastebin.com/wTat71Qe
SYN: ~6s, 49 x 64KB, 110-120ms between packets: http://pastebin.com/g5svt11P
Indy: ~9s, 95 x 32KB, 70-80ms between packets: http://pastebin.com/Dt2PydTR

Even with a larger buffer it's still as slow.

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:01 AM, <za...@hmisys.com> wrote:

> > I updated the FTP client buffers to 32K several years ago for better
> performance.
>
> Yep this was 2011 and it made a huge difference for me.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=twsocket&m=131146591403948&w=2
>
> And your response:
>
> Log:
> - Added published property DataSocketSndBufSize and public property
>   DataSocketRcvBufSize. Increase DataSocketSndBufSize in order to
>   make uploads faster. Both values default to value 8192 which is the
>   default winsock size.
>
>
> http://marc.info/?l=twsocket&m=131152163805666&w=2
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
> please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
>
-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be

Reply via email to