> And please don't tell me to abandon t2t for adoc ...
No, I sure won't suggest this at all :)
As you've noticed, there's always a way to fix a problem, as you did yourself 
with the pre- and postprocessor. It's also possible to surround problematic 
links with "" "". There is an opened issue for this problem:

txt2tags doesn't recognize all urls · Issue #114 · txt2tags/txt2tags

|   |
|   |  |   |   |   |   |   |
| txt2tags doesn't recognize all urls · Issue #114 · txt2t...The following urls 
are not correctly recognized by txt2tags trunk r641: 
https://www.familysearch.org/s/search/index/record-search-advanced#searchType=re
 cords&fed=t... |
|  |
| Afficher sur github.com | Aperçu par Yahoo |
|  |
|   |

 


     Le Samedi 25 juillet 2015 14h57, rch <r...@skynet.be> a écrit :
   

 Eric Forgeot wrote
...
>Should or could txt2tags support all of them? I don't know.
...

I say Yes
Particularly because e.g. asciidoc has no problems with
any of this

In asciidoc the uri's all work « out of the box ».

Demo at
http://users.skynet.be/watermael/miscellaneous/In_asciidoc_they_all_work.html

And please don't tell me to abandon t2t for adoc ...

Richard H

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
txt2tags-list mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/txt2tags-list

  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
txt2tags-list mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/txt2tags-list

Reply via email to