> And please don't tell me to abandon t2t for adoc ... No, I sure won't suggest this at all :) As you've noticed, there's always a way to fix a problem, as you did yourself with the pre- and postprocessor. It's also possible to surround problematic links with "" "". There is an opened issue for this problem:
txt2tags doesn't recognize all urls · Issue #114 · txt2tags/txt2tags | | | | | | | | | | | txt2tags doesn't recognize all urls · Issue #114 · txt2t...The following urls are not correctly recognized by txt2tags trunk r641: https://www.familysearch.org/s/search/index/record-search-advanced#searchType=re cords&fed=t... | | | | Afficher sur github.com | Aperçu par Yahoo | | | | | Le Samedi 25 juillet 2015 14h57, rch <[email protected]> a écrit : Eric Forgeot wrote ... >Should or could txt2tags support all of them? I don't know. ... I say Yes Particularly because e.g. asciidoc has no problems with any of this In asciidoc the uri's all work « out of the box ». Demo at http://users.skynet.be/watermael/miscellaneous/In_asciidoc_they_all_work.html And please don't tell me to abandon t2t for adoc ... Richard H ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ txt2tags-list mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/txt2tags-list
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ txt2tags-list mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/txt2tags-list
