[ The Types Forum, http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/types-list ]


1. In "The system F of variable types, fifteen years later", Girard
remarks  that there was no particular reason for the name F:

   However, in [3] it was shown that the obvious rules of conversion for
   this system, called F by chance, were converging.

There may be another explanation in his thesis, but I haven't read it
since unfortunately I am not fluent in French.

2. However, since I am semiliterate in German, I did take a look at
Gödel's paper "Über eine noch nicht benüzte Erweiterung des finiten
Standpunktes", where System T (and the Dialectia interpretation for it)
was introduced. He names this system in a parenthetical aside:

  Das heisst die Axiome dieses Systems (es werde T genannt) sind formal
  fast dieselben wie die der primitiv rekursiven Zahlentheorie [...][1]

However, the previous page and a half were spent talking about the type
structure of system T, so it is reasonable to guess that T stands for
"types". But, no explicit reason is given in print.


[1] "This means the axioms of this system (dubbed T) are nearly
the same as those of primitive recursive number theory [...]"

On 06/04/18 12:07, Alejandro Díaz-Caro wrote:
[ The Types Forum, http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/types-list ]

Dear Type-theorists,

Does anyone know where do the names System "F" and System "T" comes from? I
am not asking who introduced those names (Girard System F, and Gödel System
T), but what the "F" and the "T" means.

Kind regards,

Reply via email to