-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 7-Nov-05, at 9:38 PM, Scott Laird wrote: > So I'm leaning against including the new view code, unless > there's an overwhelming show of support, ideally including people who > already have themes submitted. So far, I've heard one person who's > against the new code. Is anyone *for* it?
It's a tough call, but as someone who submitted assuming we could only design for 2.5.6, I'm all for updating my theme to make it work with the newest code. I was actually planning on continually updating my theme. So, while version 0.1 is compatible with 2.5.6, version 0.2 will take advantage of the new features from the trunk. Despite the fact that there's a contest going on, better themes will result from iterating in the wild and continually tweaking. Besides, who wants to make themes for old code that has already changed? ;-) /Jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDcBRIsL1Y/W79qyYRAvd9AJ0eIZy6tr3PkZ0GyO08YNpDVAQc1ACfUIHK ohCbCXklCNgriaNvSFa/U9U= =x3KJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
