I haven't really looked at the new code, but how does this compare with the stock Rails register_javascript_include_default/ javascript_include_tag?
Scott On Jan 15, 2006, at 9:54 PM, Kevin Ballard wrote: > I guess it depends on how useful the option is. Quickest solution > for you would be to modify articles_helper.rb, but maybe you should > file a ticket about adding a preference and see if anybody else > chimes in? > > On Jan 15, 2006, at 9:15 PM, Eliot Landrum wrote: > >> I've modified my header to use FeedBurner feeds. If I change my >> theme to use this new header, then I have to modify >> articles_helper.rb with my FeedBurner URLs. Would it be of any >> value to have some sort of configurable feed field in the options? >> I'm not a big fan of 100-million options for everyone's >> situations, so that's why I ask if it is of any value. Should I >> just shut up and modify articles_helper.rb? > > -- > Kevin Ballard > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.tildesoft.com > http://kevin.sb.org > > _______________________________________________ > Typo-list mailing list > Typo-list@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list _______________________________________________ Typo-list mailing list Typo-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list