Rodger Donaldson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 04:51:17AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: >> Rodger Donaldson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: >> >> >> >> Again, I'm interested in everyone's input, but I'm particularly keen >> >> to hear from anyone still running 2.6.0. >> > >> > Last time I tried a rake migrate on my test box it was a disaster >> > area; I'm quite happy to do a dump of my prod 2.6 DB into a dev DB and >> > redo if that will provide useful debugging. >> >> That would be handy. We're rather more confident of the migration >> routes now that we use BareMigrations. Essentially, all the migrations >> are now protected from changes in our model classes. > > Sure.
[walkthrough of a failed upgrade elided] > Ack. So, I guess the DownloadCurrent page needs to note the > dependency on rails 1.1 and/or rake 0.7. It's too late to upgrade all > of ruby tonight 8). Drat! So it does, I shall get that sorted. We definitely depend on Rails 1.1, but an SVN download should fetch the right version of Rails through the magic of svn:externals. Sadly, we can't quite do the same thing for Rake. -- Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.bofh.org.uk/ _______________________________________________ Typo-list mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list
