+1 for stable release. On 5/6/06, Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mathew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On May 6, 2006, at 11:13 , Piers Cawley wrote: > >> I'm seriously considering a series of patches that will turn off > >> trackback sending and other notifications entirely (probably to the > >> extent of removing the code for a while) while I sort out the > >> semantics of publication. By stripping out the 'extras', I hope to be > >> able to see what's needed a little more clearly, once there's a > >> publishing pipeline in place it shouldn't be hard to reinstate > >> notfications. > >> > >> The question is, to branch, or not to branch? > > > > How about a stable release before starting a bunch of major > > disruptive work? > > Bah! Stability is overrated. But you might have a point here. > > > -- > Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > http://www.bofh.org.uk/ > _______________________________________________ > Typo-list mailing list > Typo-list@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list >
_______________________________________________ Typo-list mailing list Typo-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list
