There are a few microformat-ish things that I'd like to do after 4.0 ships. I'd like to make it easy to create hReviews as well as one of the event microformats. Beyond that, I haven't seen anything particularly exciting in the microformat world. hAtom sounds nice enough as a formatting standard, and Scribbish is already in the trunk and will be included in 4.0.
Past that, are any of the remaining microformats actually useful for anything? Scott On 7/12/06, Chris McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What is the interest level in including more (fixed) themes in the basic > typo install than just Azure? Scribbish [1] is technically very good, with > the microformats [2] built-in, but I have personally fallen in love with > Lucid [3]. I am working on altering Lucid to use microformats as I believe > they are a "good thing" and would make a great selling point to have Typo > themes use them by default. hAtom seems to be the most obvious one for blog > content, but I think others could be implemented in Typo as well. > > Anyone read the Developerworks article on microformat useage that was > posted on slashdot yesterday? [4] > > [1] http://www.quotedprintable.com/pages/scribbish > [2] http://microformats.org/wiki/Main_Page > [3] > http://typogarden.com/articles/2005/11/30/the-lucid-theme > [4] > http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/x-microformats/?ca=dgr-lnxw01Microformats > > _______________________________________________ > Typo-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list > > _______________________________________________ Typo-list mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list
