Wade Menard a écrit : > On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 17:14 +0200, Frederic de Villamil wrote: >> I've already started to re think the whole stuff from scratch, but I'm >> really looking forward your ideas. >> > > Would a WYSIWYG post editor be out of the question? > > -Wade
I've been thinking about it for a while actually, and there are lots of for and against. I really don't like wysiwyg editors, but my personnal tates is nothing when compaired to the amount of users Typo should gain with a wysiwyg interface. If we decide to enable one, it means we MUST have an alternate editor with people being able to choose whether or not they want to use it. I come from the Wordpress world where adding a rich text interface by default without any alternative really made a fuss for the 2.0 release, and they had to make a step back. There is still an issue : does the rich interface need to be enabled by default or not ? I believe it depends on another question : we want to make Typo more user friendly, but do we want him to still choose his friends or not ? -- Frédéric de Villamil "Quand tu veux chasser une belle fille, il vaut mieux commencer par draguer sa copine moche" -- précepte de go. http://t37.net http://fredericdevillamil.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel: +33 (0)6 62 19 1337 _______________________________________________ Typo-list mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list
