On 2/6/07, Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mathew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I repeat my previous comment: either HAML goes, or I do. > > Boy, you know how to make friends and influence developers don't you?
Yeah, well, I studied at the Austin Ziegler Charm School on ruby-core. :-) > For the record, as long as it's impossible to render rhtml partials > from a HAMLized view, then I'm very much inclined to roll back the > experiment of HAMLizing our various themes in favour of simply > supporting people who want to write HAML partials for things like > sidebars. Oh, I have no objection to people writing HAML if they want to. In fact, if people want to develop themes in M4, they can do that too. I just need to be able to customize my web site by editing something HTML-like. If I can't, I'll find some software where I can. It was the HAMLization of the default template that shocked me. > So a comment gatekeeper plugin would register itself as interested in > post filtering .comment-box to add a "type the results of multiplying > three by 10 here" type challenge and as a before handler > for Article::Controller#comment to check for the presence of the > correct captcha And hopefully it'd do a better job than the PHP captchas I keep running into that fail to recognize the correct answer to their own challenge because they assumed they had permission to store cookies in my browser. mathew -- <URL:http://www.pobox.com/~meta/> _______________________________________________ Typo-list mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list
