On Mar 7, 2026, at 9:43 AM, Paul Eggert via tz <[email protected]> wrote: > There are many, including the app I'm writing this email with. I daresay more > apps read TZif via other means than via tzcode and derivatives.
Any idea: 1) how many of them do so because they're using some standard library (e.g., ICU) that doesn't sit atop a tzcode-based C standard library vs. other reasons, such as an application having its own code? 2) how many of them do so because the tzcode doesn't provide some capability (e.g., calls to get a list of transitions or to determine when the next transition will be) vs. some other reason?
