On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 06:19:01 -0400, Greg Malysa wrote: > In [0], Andrew noted a code quality issue in the implementation of > blk_find_first and blk_find_next. This led to the observation that the > logic of these functions was also likely incorrect, and based on a quick > check it seemed the functions were unused outside of test code, which > did not exercise the potential failure case, so we felt they should be > removed. In [1], a test patch which illustrates the failure in sandbox > is provided for reference. > > [...]
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks! [1/1] block: Remove blk_find_first/next commit: 3532f1f5edfc97c9dcea723cdeb732eda44bc669 -- Tom