On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 05:04:38PM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 12:08:05AM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 01:39:02PM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > >On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 02:21:19AM +0000, Alice Guo (OSS) wrote: > > >> A0 has been dropped. > > > > > >Dropping support for A0 i.MX95 SoC variant in mainline U-Boot is not a > > >decision from NXP. > > > > > >There are multiple boards around with such SoC variant, just dropping > > >support for it with no explanation does not seem ok to me. > > > > A0 may not goes into mass production, so I think it will phase out. > > It would be better to update your boards to use B0. > > > > Since B0 is here, continuing A0 does not make much sense. > > This was clear and known to me. > > But that does mean that we have to just drop support from U-Boot? Is > there a significant increased maintenance effort to keep A0 silicon > alive that justify dropping support for it now? We have new products > shipping with A0/A1 silicon as of now.
Given Tim's answer in this thread as well, it sounds like A0/A1 support can't be dropped and a support path needs to be figured out. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
