On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 4:05 AM Alice Guo (OSS) <alice....@oss.nxp.com> wrote: > > Changes for v3: > - update the binman etype to generate a configuration file and a .bin > file > - update Get ahab-container.img in imx95_evk.rst > - rename configs/imx95.config to configs/imx95_evk.config > > Signed-off-by: Alice Guo <alice....@nxp.com> > --- > Alice Guo (2): > binman: add a new entry type to support .bin file generation for the > i.MX95 platform > imx95_evk: Restore support for i.MX95 A0 silicon > > Makefile | 3 +- > arch/arm/dts/imx95-u-boot.dtsi | 44 +++++++-- > arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile | 5 + > arch/arm/mach-imx/imx9/Kconfig | 5 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/imx9/scmi/container.cfg | 11 --- > arch/arm/mach-imx/imx9/scmi/imximage.cfg | 16 ---- > board/freescale/imx95_evk/MAINTAINERS | 1 + > configs/imx95_19x19_evk_defconfig | 153 > +----------------------------- > configs/imx95_a0_19x19_evk_defconfig | 2 + > configs/imx95_evk.config | 150 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > doc/board/nxp/imx95_evk.rst | 42 +++++++- > tools/binman/entries.rst | 12 +++ > tools/binman/etype/nxp_imx9image.py | 85 +++++++++++++++++ > 13 files changed, 338 insertions(+), 191 deletions(-) > --- > base-commit: 0c558bbad9e7581808b358091d1fd979f860e8ac > change-id: 20250809-imx95-10b5b18e0ad7 > > Best regards, > -- > Alice Guo <alice....@oss.nxp.com> >
Hi Alice, I have a board with IMX95 A1 silicon - with respect to this documentation should that be considered A0 vs B0? Are there any issues with A1 that would make the oei/sm/atf/uboot not compatible here? As far as I can tell the only part of boot firmware that needs compile-time configuration based on silicon revision is the imx-oei and I only see special handling for r=A0. If I build with anything other than r=A0 the OEI does not run for me whereas building with r=A0 the OEI's appear to run fine yet I don't seem to make it to U-Boot SPL. Any ideas? Best Regards, Tim
