In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > >>> Right, lots of work :). The roadmap also depends on kernel driver of > >>> RapidIO. > >> > >> Sure, I guess my point is that until there is something beyond > >> fsl_rio_quirk that would use the framework I don't see why we should > >> put it into u-boot. > >> > > Why we do not start the job with a formal framework? > > I'll leave the decision up to Wolfgang. Just giving my two cents > about it.
Always all difficult decisions are left up to me :-( I'd appreciate to see a formal framework for this, but then I also think that this needs some generalization which may be difficult or even impossible with the initial implementation. So I will neither protest against nor insist on such a formal framework. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagination is more important than knowledge. -- Albert Einstein ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
