In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > So my question is: which problem are you trying to solve that is  not
> > already solved by "make -s" or "MAKEALL"? I don't really see the need
> > for a solution between no output and full output. YMMV, of course.
> 
> It's nice to have a progress meter of what's currently being compiled, 
> without so much noise that warnings are missed.

Hm... you don't need a progress meter, you need a faster machine ;-)

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh."
- Voltaire

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to