On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:29:38 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd really like to see a common layer for SPI flash though, so I don't > > mean to criticise your effort. But it would be nice if not every new > > SPI client came with its own low-level SPI functions... > > i know exactly where you're coming from, so dont sweat it. my purpose was to > get things integrated and then take a look at the existing pieces and unify > them. easier i think to have known working code to throw at a common > framework than code for hypothetical uses we cant actually break our teeth > on. Ok, don't worry about it then. I just wanted to make sure you investigate the API(s) we already have before you propose something new. So let's just make "please use the include/spi.h API for low-level SPI access" be one of the comments on your RFC :-) Haavard ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
