Ulf, please get your quoting right!!!
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > On Monday 28 January 2008, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > > Unfortunately, this code seems useless, at least for the combination AT91 + > > SPI flash. Some issues: > > > > I believe that the AT45 is not using the same command set as other > > SPI flash memories. I think the commands need to be separated. > > i already accounted for different command sets based on part family. > > > AT45 is much more advanced than other SPI flash. > > yes, but it still has a basic subset which can be used. > > > Did you really test your code on the AT45 series? > > it was the part i developed the code on originally (the 64mbit one). > > > You assume, incorrectly, that all sector sizes are the same size. > > that depends on what level you look at it. sector 0 can be accessed in > pieces, but it can also be treated as one big sector the same as all the > others. this is how i treated it. This looks as if you were replying to your own postings, when you actualy reply to Mike's text!!! Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intel told us the Pentium would have "RISK" features... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
