On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:14:45 +0200 David Saada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ack on the 83xx change, but the 85xx code looks identical to the 83xx > > version, and 86xx bits should be identical, too, so we would be better > > off refraining from triplicating code again and find a more common > > place to put this. Jon? Andy? > Definitely true, but that's a delicate change. For instance, this UPM > patch has the same logics for the 83xx & 85xx platforms, but the > registers are different. Unifying this code should result in lots of > ugly ifdefs. which registers are different? Kim ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
