Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>   
>>> The kernel.org tree does not recognize  a  ramdisk  image  in  flash.
>>> Patches  have  been posted here since 2.4.17 times, but never made it
>>> upstream. See the archives ...
>>>   
>>>       
>> If you want to use it, put in ram before... Regards Michael
>>     
>
> yesm that's the status quo - but it's plain stupid. Why  add  another
>   
I just answer to the question.
> memory  copy of megabytes of data, when the kernel will just read the
> data, uncompres it and write it to some  (other)  RAM  location?  The
> flash  is mapped anyway (normally), so it just has to check if it's a
> RAM or flash address to decide if it should free that  area  or  not.
> That's a tiny patch, actually.
>   
Regards Michael


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to