On Feb 13, 2008, at 10:35 AM, Kim Phillips wrote: > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:54:31 -0600 (CST) > Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> +} >> + >> +U_BOOT_CMD( >> + expr, 5, 0, do_expr, >> + "expr - set environment variable as the result of eval >> expression\n", >> + "name value1 <op> value2\n" >> + " - set environment variable 'name' to the result of the >> evaluated\n" >> + " express specified by <op>. <op> can be &, |, ^, +, -, >> *, /, %\n" > > can we at least change the name to "setexpr" or something, so as not > break forward compatibility with any future GNU syntax expr > implementation?
ok. Waiting to here on wd's feeling about having this as part of the standard command set or not. - k ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
