On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> > MAKEALL | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/MAKEALL b/MAKEALL
> > index d66a5fa..2aff4da 100755
> > --- a/MAKEALL
> > +++ b/MAKEALL
> > @@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ build_target() {
> > ${MAKE} ${JOBS} all 2>&1 >${LOG_DIR}/$target.MAKELOG \
> >
> > | tee ${LOG_DIR}/$target.ERR
> >
> > - ${CROSS_COMPILE:-ppc_8xx-}size ${BUILD_DIR}/u-boot \
> > + ${CROSS_COMPILE}size ${BUILD_DIR}/u-boot \
>
> What exactly is bad about using this default?the default is useless for non-ppc systems ? try and run the MAKEALL script on a system that lacks ppc_8xx- and CROSS_COMPILE is not set and you get an error about ppc_8xx-size not existing and no useful output at all. imagine that. here's a better question: why is ppc_8xx- a better default than `size` ? you cant build u-boot on a system that lacks a host compiler and it is unrealistic to cover the case where the host `size` does not exist. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
