Rafal Jaworowski wrote: > What is the reason the MAC address on the AT91 is written in the 2nd address > register, leaving the first one out? Is there something particular about this? > > See cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ether.c, eth_init() > ... > p_mac->EMAC_SA2L = ... > ... > > The reason I ask is this may confuse OS driver if no MAC address is found in > the first register (which is the case for FreeBSD/ARM, for example). >
Hello Rick, Perhaps you could shed some light on the above? kind regards, Rafal ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
