In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > OK, time to educate Jerry since I'm too lazy to check myself. Does our > hush shell support back ticks? If we have back tick support, or can add
No, we don't, and it's not trivial to add. [Feel free to prove me worng :-) ] > that support, we should call it expr and return a value which then gets > placed properly. That would be IDEAL. > setenv foo `expr 2 + 3` Agreed. BUt that's the very reason not to call it expr, because it doesn't work this way. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can observe a lot just by watchin'. - Yogi Berra ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
