Hi,
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>> > Oops??? "rm" never asks unless you ask it to ask.
>>
>> Not true. It will ask if you don't have write permission to the file,
>> even if you are able to delete because you have write permission to the
>> directory.
>
> Does it? Indeed. Must be a GNUism. I bet this was't there in Unix v6
> when I learned it ;-)
>
>
> You are right, but this is still a special case where another,
> explicit protection is being overwritten.
* mkfs.ext2 on a file, needs -F package managers with unfulfilled
* dependencies always ask and need a "--force-xxx" to go ahead
whatsoever.
* bzip2, bunzip2, bzcat, gzip, gzcat, gunzip -f to overwrite files
* git-checkout-index needs -f to overwrite files
* git-push needs -f to push non-linear head
* git-fetch needs -f in same situtation
* rsync -force to force deletion of dirs even if not empty
....
I'll stop here. It seems the unix commandline tilted to a behaviour
where interactive commands tend to ask in dangerous situations but
scripts can explicitely override it - which is definitely what I
prefer.
Cheers
Detlev
--
Woman who seek to be equal with men lack ambition
-- Timothy Leary
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-40 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
