----- Original Message ----- From: "Cory T. Tusar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 10:05 PM Subject: [U-Boot-Users] arm920t RAM relocation broken?
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Commit d4fc6012 added an #ifdef CONFIG_AT91RM9200 construct around the > RAM relocation bits in cpu/arm920t/start.S. More directly, it added an > entire secondary relocation snippet surrounded by an > #ifdef CONFIG_BOOTBINFUNC construct. > > It appears that this second implementation was later removed in commit > 80767a6c, but the #ifdef CONFIG_AT91RM9200 logic was not removed also. > > Is RAM relocation only intended to function on at91rm9200 boards, or > shall I submit a patch fixing the above? > > - -Cory > Does this mean that the AT91RM9200 always relocates? Then the code is simply wrong. If you run from a serial flash, then the code is already relocated and is executing from SDRAM at this point, so the code will crash. Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
