On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:28:20AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 23:19 Fri 14 Mar , Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > This patch adds few routines to configure serdes on 837x targets. > > > > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > cpu/mpc83xx/Makefile | 1 + > > cpu/mpc83xx/serdes.c | 156 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/asm-ppc/fsl_serdes.h | 25 +++++++ > > 3 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 cpu/mpc83xx/serdes.c > > create mode 100644 include/asm-ppc/fsl_serdes.h > > > > diff --git a/cpu/mpc83xx/Makefile b/cpu/mpc83xx/Makefile > > index 7ad7e3e..6b6b027 100644 > > --- a/cpu/mpc83xx/Makefile > > +++ b/cpu/mpc83xx/Makefile > > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ COBJS-y += ecc.o > > COBJS-$(CONFIG_QE) += qe_io.o > > COBJS-$(CONFIG_83XX_GENERIC_PCI) += pci.o > > COBJS-$(CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT) += fdt.o > > +COBJS-$(CONFIG_FSL_SERDES) += serdes.o > Please keep it sort
Keeping cobjs in alphabetical order sounds weird to me, plus as far as I can see, current Makefile tried to keep things in this (sane) order: start.S COBJS += core (traps, cpu) COBJS += "less" important code (speed, sdram, ..) COBJS += auxiliary/not so important (pci, fdt, ....) [Almost] the same order in which the code will be executed. Though, in this case I should place SERDES above FDT, near the PCI. Anyhow, firstly I'd like to know what Kim is thinking about all this? -- Anton Vorontsov email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
