Hi  Wolfgang,

> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>> this patch adds the lzma support with the following
>> constraints:
>>
>>  - it doesn't install the LZMA SDK files. I provide the
>> import_lzma.sh
>> script to import the needs file from a lzma sdk release
>
> Sorry, but I will not accept this.
>
> U-Boot has always been self-contained, and I don't intend to
> change
> this.

Running the contained script the directory will be populated
with all need files (LzmaTypes.h, LzmaDecode.*). Anyway, I can
resubmit the patch including all files. The LZMA SDK is
released under LGPL with exceptions but I don't understand if
the license is compatible with the u-boot's license. For this
reason I omitted  the sources from the SDK.

>
> Please make sure that a patch contains all files that belong to
> it.
>
> Also, please explain what this new code is useful for. So far I
> don;t
> see any real-life use cases ?
>
>

LMZA performs better than LZ on binary files. I will switch to
LZMA to save flash memory space on my appliance. Of course, the
LZMA is slower than LZ.

Anyway, if the LZMA SDK license is compatible with U-boot , I
think that LZMA should be chosen by firmware developer when the
flash memory space is a critical resource.

My 2 Cents,

luigi

> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
> --
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev
> Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell,
> Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "I like your game but we have to change the rules."
>




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to