On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Andre Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Tor, > > after investigating the tsec code I'm wondering how your PHY works in > RGMII mode ... > > I think that there are some things missing, e.g. taking RGMII into > account during tsec_init. > > /* Init ECNTRL */ > regs->ecntrl = ECNTRL_INIT_SETTINGS; > > If you look carefully, you'll notice that ecntrl's RPM bit is > read-only. Those bits are configured by POR pin strappings. > > > sorry, my documentation (MPC8349EARM rev.1) declares this register > read-write. > Of course it will be configured by the HRCW but can be overwritten > afterwards. > > If this is not true it's a documentation bug.
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. It is almost certainly a bug. If you look at the 8349ERM (rather than the 8349EARM), you'll see that the bits are read-only (except for R100, which tsec.c does modify based on the link type). I will file a bug with the docs people. > > > You may be more familiar with the UEC, which doesn't automatically > detect the link type, but is otherwise fairly similar to the tsec. > > > What do you mean ? > I'm trying to get two VSC8601 RGMII PHYs running on a MPC8343B ... sorry, I forgot which ethernet controller you were using, and I'm not as familiar with the 83xx family as the 85xx family. Some of our parts have the QUICC Engine, which has an ethernet controller with some similar registers to the TSEC's. I was guessing that was why you thought those bits were writable, rather than a documentation bug, but clearly I was wrong. :) Andy Andy ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
