On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Stelian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le vendredi 04 avril 2008 à 13:32 -0700, Zac Wheeler a écrit : > > > I have a question about the arrangement of include files for the > > at91sam9 family. > > > > Is the intention that asm/arch/at91_xxx.h be applicable for all > > at91sam9 microcontrollers, or should they be broken down into subarch > > folders (e.g. asm/arch/at91sam9261/at91_pmc.h)? > > They are supposed to be shareable for all at91sam microcontrollers, in > the same way it's done in Linux.
So should things like AT91_ECC as defined in at91sam960.h be AT91SAM9260_ECC instead or moved to an at91_sys.h file? It seems somewhat dangerous to define an AT91_ in a AT91SAM9260-specific file. Sorry for my lack of understanding if I'm missing the point. Zac ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
