Peter Pearse wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: 11 April 2008 14:18 >>To: Peter Pearse >>Cc: 'Guennadi Liakhovetski'; u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [GIT PULL] Please pull u-boot-arm >> >>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>>Actually, I think, even Peter should not reset his tree, >> >>but revert >> >>>>just as well as you are going to do it: his tree is publically >>>>accessible too, and if he resets his tree, it will become >> >>unclear, >> >>>>where respective commits from the central tree come from. >>> >>>Agreed. >>> >>>I shall revert u-boot-arm commits in the order listed. >> >>OK, I reverted the commits in the master branch now. > > > And I've reverted u-boot-arm
What's the status of re-applying the reverted patches? I really like to see [PATCH v2] ARM: Davinci: Fix DM644x timer overflow handling and cleanup http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/38505 in mainline. Sorry if I missed anything, Dirk ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
