Hi Wolfgang,
even though I like the weak stuff, I agree with you. I also like Stefan's
idea about removing the #ifdef from the code.
So I will update my patch in this direction.
The main idea behind my patch is to fix the bootloader autoprotection
for 4xx. Do you (sr, J., others) think i is also a good idea to add this:
/* Monitor protection ON by default */
#if (CFG_MONITOR_BASE >= CFG_FLASH_BASE)
flash_protect (FLAG_PROTECT_SET,
CFG_MONITOR_BASE,
+#if defined(CONFIG_4xx)
0xffffffff,
+#else
CFG_MONITOR_BASE + monitor_flash_len - 1,
+#endif
flash_get_info(CFG_MONITOR_BASE));
#endif
To be honest, I hope to get my autoprotection patch into 1.3.3 (as a bug fix).
But the above three lines would be satisfactory for fixing the issue.
Finally I would like to have both changes applied.
Matthias
On Sunday 20 April 2008 03:14:10 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > > +#if defined(CFG_FLASH_AUTOPROTECT_LIST)
> > > + struct apl_s {
> > > + ulong start;
> > > + ulong size;
> > > + } apl[] = CFG_FLASH_AUTOPROTECT_LIST;
> > > +#endif
> >
> > I think it will be better to create a weak structure.
>
> In the interest of memory footprint I prefer to stick with the #ifdef
> here.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
