In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > Why not using a feature-rich, money-efficient solution like Linux? One > > of the big advantages is that you get a running system completely for > > free and out of the box... > > The software has to eventually undergo certification, and uC/OS-II should > be a smaller codebase to certify than Linux.
The code base may be smaller, but the cost may or may not be smaller. There are some interesting activities going on. Please check out the information about the "Safety Critical Linux" project run by the Open Source Automation Development Lab (OSADL), see http://www.osadl.org/Safety-Critical-Linux.safety-critical-linux.0.html There is a real chance to establish an "Open Certification Process" in a not to far future, so Linux might still be a better long-tem investment. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The light at the end of the tunnel is usually a "No Exit" sign. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
