In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > Of course, your solution will work with multiple, different SPI
> > controllers while mine won't, but is that really necessary?
> >
> > Your solution comes with more error checking as well, which might be a
> > good thing, but since it comes with a cost of additional memory and
> > flash footprint, I think it should be optional. Maybe we could provide
> > some library functions to simplify the drivers that want this?
>
> I see. Well, I don't have a strong preference. So, either we need more
> votes, or the one who implements it decides:-)
That was two pros - did I miss any cons ?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know if it's what you want, but it's what you get. :-)
- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
