On Friday 09 May 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > This patch hasn't been tested on all the boards involved, so there are > probably a few issues. For now, I'd like some comments on the new > interface -- if it looks good, we should spend some additional effort > to validate that it doesn't introduce any breakage. I could use some > help with this.
just a quick glance, but do we care about U-Boot being a SPI slave ? i only noticed this as i was working on the Blackfin I2C driver recently and realized that the I2C framework has defines for U-Boot to act as a slave. not that the Blackfin driver even has any of the slave stuff implemented, i just noticed it ;). -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
