On Wed, 21 May 2008 15:34:32 +0200
Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately several wrong fixes or false positives still remains,
> > but this patch definitely reduce the number of wrong indentations.
> 
> Could you please point out the remaining problems?  If  I  understand
> what's  gone  wrong  I probably can fix my procedure and spin another
> patch?
> 

although the existing patch should definitely stay committed, here are a
couple of examples of things I'd expect it to have fixed:

board/freescale/mpc8349itx/mpc8349itx.c:120
board/freescale/mpc8349itx/mpc8349itx.c:275
board/freescale/mpc8349emds/pci.c:56

Also, although less authoritative (esp. for u-boot),
linux-2.6/scripts/checkpatch.pl output is always interesting on these
types of patches.

I'll be sure to get some by hand - I understand these expressions
sometimes get too unwieldly too fast.

Kim

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to