Hi Sergei,
On Wednesday 28 May 2008, Sergei Poselenov wrote:
> >> + if (gur->porpllsr & (1<<15)) {
> >
> > Please don't use pointer access for such SoC registers. in_be32() is
> > recommended here.
>
> What is the reason for doing this? Compiler issues? I see the direct
> pointer addressing is used all over the 85xx code.
Yes, I just noticed that these registers are accessed this way on (all?)
MPC85xx boards. So it is perhaps not a problem with these registers. Not sure
though, since I'm no MPC85xx expert. Perhaps somebody from FSL can comment
here.
Best regards,
Stefan
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=====================================================================
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
