Andrejs Cainikovs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Our boards flash driver is the same as in board/atmel/at91rm9200dk/flash.c > The only thing that was modified is the flash identification routine, as > there was no support for AT49BV642D.
This chip is supported by the CFI driver (the ATNGW100 board relies on that.) > The flash organization for this chip is the same as in AT49BV6416 which > exists in the sources, so we haven't changed a lot. This chip is not yet supported by the CFI driver. It needs a fixup due to reversed erase region information, but since the CFI driver only reads the low 8 bits of the ID, there's currently no way to tell it apart from AT49BV642D, which doesn't need this fixup. If someone can figure out how to read a 16-bit ID when appropriate, I suspect we can get rid of quite a few board-specific flash drivers (including the one for ATSTK1000). Unfortunately, I don't have the time to look into this myself at the moment. Haavard ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
