On 00:02 Tue 17 Jun , Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:13:32 -0500 > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > However, I was mistaken about my code being committed into the > > official u-boot tree. Please see my response above. > > Ok, I figured it must be something like that. > > That said, I take it this means that we have not two but _three_ > drivers for the same hardware floating around in various trees, all of > which are forked off the original avr32 driver. I think this is another > reason to get those drivers merged together ASAP. > > I also hope that we can get your MMC+ support into the common driver > eventually, with proper attributions and copyrights of course ;-) but I > think the merge needs to happen first. > > I suggest we start with the three patches I posted moving the avr32 > driver into drivers/mmc, then make the minimal set of changes necessary > to support AT91 and Diopsis, and then start adding additional features > from the other drivers, like MMC+ and SDHC support. > > The first two steps should certainly be doable in time for the next > merge window. I suspect MMC+ and SDHC support needs more testing and > review, but it may be doable as well. > > Does this sound like a good plan to everyone?
Good for me Best Regards, J. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
