On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 08:47:29PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > I was wondering if u-boot would also accept the merge of a framebuffer > > driver that doesn't allow runtime mode-setting. > > What makes you think that would be a problem?
That there is no infrastructure (at leaste I've not seen one) for a driver to cleanly indicate that it doesn't support modesetting. So what do we do? Just silently ignore calls to change the video mode? > And in U-Boot there are some frame buffer drivers that are completely > fixed for a specific configuration, too. good. > What exactly was your problem? I didn't want to submit a driver that doesn't implement the standard/full interface of a framebuffer driver inside u-boot without asking whether that was actually ok. -- - Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
