[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Open question: >> >> * Are CFG_64BIT_LBA and CONFIG_LBA48 kind of redundant? >> At least it seems that CONFIG_LBA48 requires CFG_64BIT_LBA to be >> set or we will have problems due to insufficient size of the data >> types.
Ok, I see. CFG_64BIT_LBA is somewhat redundant. The 64bit prints are (and sector reads from command line) are protected by different define's Taking off CFG_64BIT_LBA and making the secrtor number always a 64bit should be perfectly fine. And we're quickly approaching the 2.1TB limit a 32bit lba has anyways. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
