[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on : > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > Question: Why did you accept all the initial patches for > > cpu/arm1136/mx31/interrupts.c and for the boards mx31ads, > > imx31_litekit, imx31_phycore? > > Nobody raised concerns, and I did not notice problems either. I do > not claim to catch 100% of all issues (I don't even claim to review > all postings).
If I could remember correctly, we (TQS) paid DENX for the U-Boot porting of the mx31ads board. It is a little bit surprising that now the patch for our own i.mx31 based board is not accepted, although we used the mx31ads port as basis. The reason for paying the mx31ads port was to get an accepted basis for a common i.mx31 board into the official U-Boot tree, to have a stable basis for further portings of i.mx31 boards (and to give something back to the great U-Boot community which is hopefully useful for many other users). Best Regards, Martin Krause -- TQ-Systems GmbH Muehlstrasse 2, Gut Delling, D-82229 Seefeld Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 105 018, UST-IdNr. DE 811 607 913 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Detlef Schneider, Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Ruediger Stahl http://www.tq-group.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
